On Music and Scores Part Three: Development/Embellishment of Leitmotif’s

Standard

 

This is how adults solved their problems.

 

yeesh. I’m not sure why i delayed the release of the last part of this series for 3 months, as it’s been sitting on my hard drive complete since at least June…

and remember to read parts one and two before starting here.

 

The last principle to be discussed naturally takes an understanding of the concepts of Introduction and Reinforcement to grasp. As Development/Embellishment is the most abstract, nebulous, and open for individual interpretations of the three guiding principles; thus the viewer should use the previous two to see if their thoughts on development are founded and backed.

To use narrative terms Development is the moral of the score; and much like a story’s moral Development constitutes the reason for the score to exist within the narrative. It is however important to note that development doesn’t only come at the end of the story, as musical themes can grow and change throughout the course of the narrative to better suit the composer’s and story’s needs.

First though i feel it is important to provide the reason why the third principle encompasses both Development and Embellishment of a theme (instead of them being separate). When i say that a theme develops, i generally mean that the music changes in context and meaning throughout the course of the film. Technically the themes can change their tonal colour or melody entirely to emphasise dramatic developments within the narrative. An example of technical development (leading to a complete change of the original theme) is the theme of the Ring Wraiths from the The Lord of the Rings films.

Continue reading

LADY SNOWBLOOD & LOVE SONG OF VENGEANCE

Standard

 

It has been a frightfully long time since i put up something here, the reason for that is that i’m currently writing a series of posts that are probably the biggest ones to be put on this site to date and it has been taking up a bit of my time. To be honest though so has Dragon Age: Inquisition…

Anywho, i recently watched the excellent Criterion release of the film in the title and figured it would be suitable for a review.

Continue reading

VERSUS

Standard
versus 1

because a poster wouldn’t be this awesome

Apparently this is this blogs 75th post, had i known i would’ve probably done something different for the occasion, oh well!

I will freely admit i’m a bit of a snob when it comes to movies. Most times it is impossible for me to simply turn off my brain while watching something. It comes as a bit of a curse when i would want nothing more to have fun during otherwise terrible movies (all of the Transformers movies, Karas, etc.), and just enjoy the explosions, but in most cases i can’t.

Thankfully a movie like “Versus” exists that allows me to do just that then.

 

THE STORY

Doesn’t matter. I’m dead serious.

 

THE GOOD

Everything.

Alright, where to start really? I will admit fully that this film reads like a grocery list of things i found awesome from the ages of 12 – 17, a short list is as follows:

Samurai
Karate
Zombies
Vampires
Techno Music
Amnesia
Leather Jackets
Leather Trench Coats
Leather Boots
Fitted Suits
Motorcycles
Riding Motorcycles with no Helmet
Shades
Putting on Shades
Taking off Shades
Spinning 360 Shots
Brushing Long Hair Out of You Eyes
Guns
Shooting Guns
Duel Wielding Guns
Shooting Zombies with Guns
Samurai Fighting Zombies with Swords
Oversized Katanas
Duel Wielding Oversized Katanas
Incredibly Stupid Poses with Oversized Katanas
Brutal but Stylised Violence
Indifferent Heros
Anti-Heros
Mysterious Anti-Heros with Numbers instead of Names
Prison Breaks
Reincarnation
Destiny

That’s just a short list of what goodies are found here, and indeed the teenager/neckbeard in me still loves the shit out of all of it.

ALL OF IT…

 

THE BAD

There’s nothing more for me to say really, i can go into how the story is just an obligatory addition to the various fight scenes. Or how the production values are a little on the low side. Or how most people would probably roll their eyes so hard as to eject them from their seats because of how stupid this all is. But you already knew that, and is therefore not worth going into detail.

 

THE UGLY

I think the key to my enjoyment of this film is that the story as bare bones as it is just barely holds everything together, and not only does it check all of the boxes in various fantasy versions of myself the film makers also approached the ridiculousness of the situation with so much wild enthusiasm that i can’t help but jump in and wish i too was cruising down the highway, my leather trench coat billowing in the wind and my trusty Katana at the ready.

Again i think even that is over thinking things too much. Bottom line is that if any of that list above makes you dry heave then this movie will certainly not convince you otherwise. But, if any of the above is in your list of guilty pleasures, dive in.

You’ll love it.

**** OUT OF FIVE

KARAS: THE PROPHECY

Standard

karas2

I have decided to redo my first review that i posted up here, as it bothers me that i’ve let Ten Years Too Late sit stagnant for so long (this is really because of a tremendous amount of homework i’ve had lately). So i’m going to keep the lights on here by tidying up this review’s format and diction.

Also i consider warning people about this awful awful movie a bit of a social responsibility so you’re welcome!

I first saw this film at the young age of 18. I was just out of school and working a part time job, of which i was spending all of my earnings cruising through the HMV’s that were scattered throughout Edmonton and amassing the lion’s share of my DVD collection.

Having seen or purchased some of the best anime had to offer (Akira, Perfect Blue, etc), i decided to explore some of the other more obscure offerings of the genre. Having seen the box art of Karas: The Prophecy a number of other times before, i decided to read some reviews of it and found it to be awash in superb ratings and recommendations. So i took the plunge and spent 25 whole dollars on it.

And after the movie abruptly ended stopped, and left me in complete and utter bewilderment, I made a promise to myself:

never ever believe what the anime community recommends for good anime…

 

THE GOOD

Surprisingly, the movie does have some redeeming features. For one it is an extremely well animated movie. The intro sequence alone is worth a look, featuring a fantastic aerial duel between two armoured beings that shape shift between dog fighting jets, and sword wielding samurai thingys. The action takes them from the high skies above Tokyo (presumably) to the building tops in spectacular fashion, and its a great example of a “shark attack beginning” that serves to really grab your attention and make you wonder what is in store next. The other duels, don’t quite match the scope of the introductory one, but they do not drop in quality of presentation and execution throughout the movie.

The animation is complemented with a nice slick visual design of the characters and settings. The basements are suitably grimy, and the more mystical areas are majestically presented. the characters themselves have at least memorable looks that serve to distinguish them from each other, which really really helps because if it weren’t for that i feel any viewer would be absolutely lost in trying to follow along with the various plots that come up.

The last positive thing i can say about this film is that the animation and visual design are accompanied by a wonderfully passionate score from Yoshihiro Ike. Notably it pops up whenever Karas shows up, with dashes of a full choir and a strong brass and treble section it lends a nice heroic theme in the same vein as Danny Elfman’s Batman theme or even John Williams Superman theme.

 

 

THE BAD

The worst offence of this film will have to lie in its story, to say that Karas’ plot is “amateurish” is to put it lightly, very lightly. For starters it has five distinct plots all vying for attention in a film that boasts a running time of barely 80 minutes. They are as far as i can discern as follows:

1. The introduction of a new Karas (presumably a guardian of humanity) following the defeat of the previous one in the introductory battle sequence, he is given these powers by what i will name Goggle Girl #1 for lack of any memorable name.

2. The villain’s own agenda of creating machine demons to terrorize the citizens of Tokyo, he also keeps (presumably) a Goggle Girl of his own in a tank for some reason.

3. The story of two cops assigned to investigate the killings perpetuated by the demons.

4. The redemption quest of one of the spirit beings, to hunt down and kill the demons wherever they may be hiding.

5. The agenda of Goggle Girl #2 and of (presumably) her own Karas to prevent something from happening to everyone i guess.

Yes. All of that is crammed into 80 whole minutes of absolute confusion. The cop story gets the lions share of the running time, and due to it being tied by circumstance the redemption spirit story gets most of the rest of it. Now this wouldn’t be a bad thing per-se if the movie just picked one of these threads to follow, but that just plain old doesn’t happen.

All of these stories running in tandem in a film of such length brings up another terrible flaw; the fact that new characters are introduced in just about every other scene for most of the running time. This has the result of important unresolved plot points being skipped and vital exposition being sidelined for more plot to be piled on and more questions to be asked.

Adding to the confusion, most of the scenes feel like they start in the middle of something, like the conversation between the characters had just about wrapped up and we only see the result of it (most of the scenes involving Karas and Goggle Girl #1 are like this). The movie is structured in such a way that you feel like you should have a book of it opened in your lap and pause the movie after every scene to read up on the moments that come between each. Half of the movie goes by before you’re even remotely given anything resembling an explanation as to who anyone is and what is happening.

I simply cannot stress hard enough about the fact that the film’s narrative structure is awful. With the running time being so short you would figure that the producers wouldn’t put one inch of fat into the narrative. I can tell you if you make that assumption you would be miserably disappointed, there is plenty of fat to trim in the movie, i will sum up the biggest example:

– The scene starts by introducing two new characters to the film, a young couple driving in a tuned up car through a tunnel. They are as a side note given more than a few lines to say to each other.

– The man spots another similar looking car ahead and gets it into his head that a street race would be a good thing to do.

– The car he is racing turns out to be one of those machine demons that have been set loose, after dissolving the man’s old lady via a purple mist it sets its attentions on the car and begins to tear it up via its large saw blades it has for arms.

– Redemption Spirit man shows up and duels with the demon machine. The duel is evenly matched.

– Karas also shows up via long already seen and established introduction and duels with the demon.

– The demon escapes to fight another day.

So that’s the scene in a nutshell, there are a few details i may have missed or confused but that is irrelevant to the problem this scene presents when taken into the structure of the movie as a whole. This being chiefly that it doesn’t need to be present in it at all.

Everything in it has either been shown previously, or could be shown later to no ill effect. Redemption man is shown hunting the demons down in the previous scene, and just like before he doesn’t get the chance to ice them as Karas shows up. Karas’ powers and purpose are introduced in the previous scene as well, that being to hunt and destroy the demons. Why is all that reiterated here?

We don’t learn anything more about the plot or the characters, as this scene is mostly used for set up of the road demon for a later action sequence, however you could take this scene out completely to no ill effect of that later one; as the film has already set up the fact that the demons are hiding and hunting around the city in mundane forms. The later tunnel sequence revisits and one ups this scene by having Karas kill the demon, and having an important detailed revealed about redemption man, as well as some other plot details being introduced (these are of course represented as new characters). Making this one irrelevant when viewing the movie as a whole.

Taking all of that into account its easy to see that the whole sequence is pure filler. Yes that’s right; in a movie this short, bursting at the seams with dangling plot threads, and overloaded with characters the producers thought it necessary to include an unneeded action scene.

 

THE UGLY

This film has been produced by people who have no concept of what makes a story a story. They seemed to have decided to skip out on the boring little things like: exposition, narrative structure, and scene cohesion. Instead they overloaded it with cool things like: Katana’s, duel wielding .45’s, gruesome deaths, jets, burnt out cops, and fast cars.

Now maybe you would think that makes this film not worth watching (or really worth a look…), but i truly believe that Karas: The Prophecy should be shown by any film studies instructor as a one of a kind example of how bad a plot can be presented. It’s like the plot was a beautiful stain glass painting and someone threw a hammer into it, and then glued in the prettiest colours back into the frame.

It is also shows how flawed my young mind was, while watching Star Wars and all the while thinking:

“Why aren’t there more light saber duels/shoot outs?”

Not realising that all action scenes in order not to be completely incomprehensible and utterly boring in their motivations must evolve from the plot naturally, and not just be plunked down anywhere you may feel like it.

So i guess, a thank you is necessary Karas: The Prophecy thank you for showing us all how not to suck.

 

* STAR OUT OF FIVE

FILM REVIEW: HARAKIRI & HARAKIRI: Death of a Samurai

Standard

Since i blathered on about how great this film was in my review for Samurai Rebellion, i thought it prudent that i review this film next. In a bit of change of format this is gonna be a double bill as i have seen both the original and remake of this film.

The original is first up since i saw it first and is worth studying in-depth.

 

THE STORY

To be a Samurai without a clan is to have a hard life during the peace of the Tokugawa Shogunate, the beaten down ronin, Tsugumo Hanshirō appears at the gates of the Li clan and requests to end is existence via honourable Harakiri. But not all is as it seems…

 

THE GOOD

This is another one of those movies that is just about perfect in every aspect, the acting by Tatsuya Nakadai is an example of his usual subtle greatness, and all of his supporting cast no less accomplished. Every shot is meticulously framed and blocked to appear as haunting and claustrophobic as possible, the sharpness of the instrumentation in the score adds to the bite of the scenes, and the story’s plotting is an absolute delight, with each passing scene being a turning of a page that keeps adding more twists and turns to a growing tragedy.

Masaki Kobayashi absolutely crucifies the romanticised ideals of the Samurai code of honour. Tsugumo Hanshiro does everything expected of an honourable Samurai and a good father, and in the end he is rewarded with nothing but a poor life that ends tragically in violence. On the flip side the young Chijiiwa Motome is shown no respite and no mercy when it becomes apparent that he traded in his sword for money to live, and the brutality of being forced to commit Harakiri with a bamboo sword is absolutely horrific and puts a stain on the house of Li.

I really don’t want to give away too many details regarding the plot as the story is just so well paced, but by the final shot it is apparent that the code of Bushido can and is ruined by the realities of trying to live in a harsh and unforgiving world.

 

THE BAD

As i stated earlier there is very little that is wrong with Harakiri, the only apparent flaws would have to be with its accessibility to wider audiences with it being in black and white, subtitled, and being very much a Japanese film.

Also the film while not being overly long in length certainly feels like it takes its time getting to where its going, but it cannot be stressed enough that the payoff is most certainly worth the time.

 

THE UGLY

Tsugumo Hanshiro states before meeting his death that: “a man cannot live on honour alone”.

The brilliance of this statement in underlining the ridiculousness of structure and the hypocrisy of the institution of Bushido is one of the most powerful lines delivered in Samurai Cinema or indeed in any cinema. Harakiri shows us these brutal realities, it has moments of horror, joy, sadness, and tragedy and all of that adds up to a hell of a good story to experience.

**** 1/2 OUT OF FIVE

 

HARAKIRI: Death of a Samurai

i won’t go into too much detail with the remake as it although being quite good, it is ultimately unnecessary.

To the film’s credit it does go in a different direction than the original in an attempt to make its own identity, loosing some of the criticism of the Samurai way of life and dialling up the melodrama inherent in the story, and i will say i don’t think this is a bad thing. I teared up during some of the scenes, which is something i didn’t do at all during the original.

As for direct comparisons, the most obvious given that the director of this version is Takashi Miike (who gave us wonderful scenes like the piano wire and feet thingy in Audition) i must say that it is a toss-up between which one of Chijiiwa Motome’s death via bamboo sword is worse. Both are lengthy, hard to watch scenes of forced self-torture and mutilation. But if i were to choose one i would have to say the original is probably the most brutal for the way it was shot and the fact that mercy is withheld for Motome until in a moment of desperation he bites his own tongue off (sounds like a good date movie doesn’t it?).

If you only watch one of these films, my recommendation is to watch the original, as its social commentary will keep it floating well after the remake is forgotten. BUT if you really don’t want to watch the original for whatever reason, the remake is still Harakiri and it just can’t be helped that the story at the core of this film is just plain old good stuff.

*** OUT OF FIVE

FILM REVIEW: SAMURAI REBELLION

Standard

Had a bit of brake there but its straight back to reviewing for me!

This film is included in the awesome Rebel Samurai box set from the criterion collection, i don’t have too much biographical points to make other than it’s the first of the box set i watched because it stars the ruggedly handsome Toshiro Mifune (i mean look at this guy, as a young man he might as well be a japanese brad pitt or james dean) and is therefore worth watching.

 

THE STORY

TAKEN FROM CRITERION’S SYNOPSIS OF FILM

“…Isaburo Sasahara, an aging swordsman living a quiet life until his clan lord orders that his son marry the lord’s mistress, who has recently displeased the ruler. Reluctantly, father and son take in the woman, and, to the family’s surprise, the young couple fall in love. But the lord soon reverses his decision and demands the mistress’s return. Against all expectations, Isaburo and his son refuse, risking the destruction of their entire family…”

 

THE GOOD

While watching the film i was immediately reminded of the wonderful Harakiri (1962)*, its plot details the rigidity and boredom of what a life of a Samurai must’ve been after the Sengoku Jidai had ended.

All of the rules and customs that come with feudal rule are portrayed in quite an unflattering way. In Samurai Rebellion the lord’s word was to be obeyed without question regardless of its morality or justification; it is in this suffocating atmosphere the plot develops into a scathing criticism of just how backwards this time and place was when compared to modern views which is contrary to the typical romanticism that is usually present in period films.

The most damning criticism is with the issue of woman’s rights (or lack thereof) as Ichi Sasahara is traded back and forth on the whim of the fief’s lord and is regarded by him as a decoration and status symbol. This is done with total disregard of her feelings, or the well-being of her children. In medieval Japan a woman and her family did what they were ordered to do and there wasn’t anything that could be done about it honour be damned.

On top of the substance the film is also quite a visual treat, with the camera’s movement, blocking,  and set design all contributing and embellishing the conflicts that develop within the plot and is well worth studying for someone interested in visual story telling.

All of the actors manage to find their parts and lend them the necessary humanity, Yôko Tsukasa and Gô Katô play the story’s star-crossed lovers with a growing and lovely intimacy that really makes us believe that the two characters genuinely love each other. Toshiro Mifune masterfully scowls through yet another one of his old weathered samurai roles, and although his sword play here isn’t as explosive as in Yojimbo or Sanjuro he is still rather well-trained in the art of Kenjutsu and it is always a pleasure to watch one of his scenes. To add to all of this the great Tatsuya Nakadai shows up for a few scenes which is always a good thing.

 

THE BAD

Although Samurai Rebellion’s story and themes are quite reminiscent of Harakiri i find that there is a reason why the latter is more popular and remembered. Although the rigidity of traditional customs like arranged marriage and the boredom and stagnation that war hardened veterans can face when peace is all that remains is criticised, the overall situation that the characters face isn’t as desperate as the one faced by the protagonists of Harakiri. Despite the central tragedy of the plot being the lack of a couple’s rights to remain married and how woman were mistreated, it just doesn’t have as much of a bite as Harakiri’s damnation of the entire idea of Samurai honour.

 

THE UGLY

While not being quite as damning a critique of the Samurai way of life as his previous film was Masaki Kobayashi does manage to turn in a film that still manages to have a rather unflattering portrayal of a rather glorified place in history. As a result not only should it be recognised for its social critiques it is also a rather great movie to watch.

 

**** OUT OF FIVE

* it wasn’t until i had finished watching the film did i find out it was actually directed by the same man Mr. Kobayashi.

awesomenessesesss

Standard

haven’t done one of these in a bit so i present for your pleasure ”Red Warrior” from written by Hans Zimmer from The Last Samurai

What happened to Hans Zimmer? Here we have a really heroic and rousing theme to be put over a battle, and over and above that we heard this same melody before (at about 3:00 min mark) in ”spectres in the fog” and it has developed from that last cue.

Now all Zimmer does is play a couple of notes that hint vaguely at the themes he is trying to embellish and never take it anywhere…